February2012

Dow Chemical Loses Elastomers Patent Lawsuit Against LG Chem

Feb 29, 2012
No Comments Yet
(Source: Chemical and Engineering News)

MedWorm Sponsor Message: Please support the Doctors In Chains campaign for the medics tortured and sentenced for up to 15 years in Bahrain. #FreeDoctors

The Interent Meme of Lt. John Pike

Feb 29, 2012
No Comments Yet


LIONEL NY’s PIX 11 News Commentary Aired: November 26, 2011 UC David Police Lt. John Pike is an Internet(s) meme phenom.

2nd Citizens Choice 22

Feb 29, 2012
No Comments Yet
2nd Citizens Choice 22

Picture taken by Anonymous9000 on 2010-06-19 15:38:07.

Top Lawsuit Stories for 2-29-2012

Feb 29, 2012
By
No Comments Yet
Good day everyone! Here are your top lawsuit stories for February 29, 2012. More claims about how certain companies or individuals have inflated statistics regarding fuel-efficiency. And more new on the continuing “Occupy” lawsuit sagas. The arguments seem to be the same in most case; that First Amendment rights have been violated when they were forces to disband their camps. Check out the latest links:

5 states face deadline on Honda hybrid lawsuit

Occupy Santa Barbara gets another crack at lawsuit

US court upholds sexual discrimination case against L&T Infotech

Ex pro wrestler’s lawsuit says ‘heel’ cost him a testicle – Not really the biggest news of the day but things appear to be a little quiet today on the lawsuit front. It would be very hard to discern what occurred in such a case when the whole idea behind this form of entertainment is to try and cover-up what is discernible. In any case, one for the sensationalistic books.

Business lawsuits in sharp increase – More international lawsuit news out of China. They are claiming the international economic slowdown has caused a 10% increase in lawsuits over the last year. Might very well be.

That’s it for today. Thanks for stopping by and we will see you next time at eLawsuit.com.

Fosamax Lawsuit News: Jury Trial Begins In New Jersey State Court

Feb 28, 2012
No Comments Yet

Fosamax-related litigation is moving forward in both federal and state courts. The latest Fosamax lawsuit news occurred on February 27, 2012 when the sixth Fosamax trial began in the Superior Court for Atlantic County, New Jersey. The two cases, which are being tried together, are Flores v. Merck and Sessner v. Merck. Plaintiffs in both cases allege that their Fosamax use caused them to develop osteonecrosis of the jaw (“ONJ”). Opening statements are scheduled to commence on Thursday, March 1, 2012. This Fosamax trial is part of In re: Fosamax Litigation, which is a consolidation of all Fosamax lawsuits filed in New Jersey state courts. Because the side effects of Fosamax include femur fractures and ONJ both types of lawsuits have been consolidated into one mass tort action; the Honorable Carol E. Higbee is overseeing the state court litigation. The last Fosamax lawsuit news update in the state court action occurred in November 2011. At that time, Judge Higbee ordered that the ONJ cases would be tried first; jury trials involving the Fosamax femur fracture claims would follow. Because Merck, the manufacturer of Fosamax, is defending both groups of cases, there is overlapping discovery. For example, many of the same documents produced by Merck will be used by plaintiffs as evidence to support both the ONJ and femur fracture claims. Therefore, the lawyers at Bernstein Liebhard LLP have been carefully monitoring Fosamax lawsuit news and developments in the ONJ cases in order to anticipate issues that may arise when litigating the upcoming femur fracture claims.

Federal Fosamax Lawsuit News: Federal MDL Expanded To Additional Femur Fracture Claims

In addition to the recent Fosamax lawsuit news on the state court level, on February 3, 2012, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”) ordered that all Fosamax lawsuits filed in federal courts nationwide by individuals alleging that they sustained an atypical femur fracture as a result of taking the bisphosphonate, can also include plaintiffs who took similar medications such as Reclast or Boniva as long as they did, in fact, take Fosamax. When the Fosamax femur fracture multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) was originally formed, it was restricted to femur fracture claims brought by plaintiffs who only took Fosamax. In deciding to expand the Fosamax femur fracture MDL, the JPML noted that because the side effects of Fosamax are similar to other bisphosphonates, the MDL should include femur fracture claims brought by plaintiffs who used other types of bisphosphonates in addition to Fosamax. Thus, this federal Fosamax lawsuit news is particularly noteworthy. Individuals permitted to file femur fracture claims in the Fosamax femur fracture MDL are no longer limited to those who solely took Fosamax. Now that the JPML has ordered that mixed cases (those filed by plaintiffs who took Fosamax and another bisphosphonate) be included and transferred to the ongoing Fosamax femur fracture MDL, plaintiffs who were originally barred from having their femur fracture claims included in the consolidated action can now participate.

More Fosamax Lawsuit News: Over 2,000 ONJ And Femur Fracture Claims Filed Against Merck

Fosamax was introduced by Merck in 1995. Before it became available in generic form, Fosamax sales topped $3 billion annually. Currently, more than 2,000 cases involving either ONJ or femur fracture claims have been filed and are pending against Merck in either state or federal court. Although Merck is defending against two distinct allegations, the only Fosamax lawsuits that have gone to trial are those in which plaintiffs allege that their Fosamax use caused them to develop ONJ. None of the Fosamax trials to date have involved femur fracture claims.

Because taking Fosamax can cause a variety of severe, potentially permanent health problems, many afflicted patients have sought compensation by filing individual Fosamax lawsuits. The lawyers at Bernstein Liebhard LLP are actively reviewing Fosamax femur fracture claims. If you suffered a femur fracture, our team of Fosamax attorneys can help you seek compensation for your injuries.

If you or a loved one took Fosamax and suffered an atypical femur fracture, contact us today to learn more about your legal options.

Fort Worth Bankruptcy Lawyer

Feb 28, 2012
No Comments Yet
In dire need of a Fort Worth bankruptcy lawyer? Found yourself in way too high of a debt load and no end in sight? Creditors banging on you door day and night? Well, you’ve come to the right place!

At www.eLawsuit.com, we will put you in contact with a bankruptcy lawyer as soon as possible. All you have to do is follow below to fill out a super easy form and the proper Fort Worth bankruptcy lawyer will be in touch with you ASAP.

In conjunction with TotalAttorneys.com, eLawsuit.com is very happy to provide you with the best possible service and assistance in today’s rapidly changing legal environment. Please let us know if we can help in any other way and good luck with your future and finding the attorney that suits your needs.



**A note to keep in mind. With many people struggling to make it out of the debt crisis unscathed, filing for bankruptcy is an avenue many are choosing in order to keep their houses and other valuable assets. A good bankruptcy lawyer is a good suggestion to help you through the complexities of bankruptcy. If you are thinking about going through the bankruptcy process on your own, you might be wise to think this over. Getting a lawyer is probably the smartest thing to do when all is said and done.

FDA Requirements for Zimmer Hip Implant Recall

Feb 28, 2012
No Comments Yet

Zimmer Holdings Inc. manufactures the Durom Cup hip implant, a metal-on-metal device designed to improve patient range of motion, especially in younger, more active device recipients. However, a 2008 study by Dr. Lawrence Dorr revealed that Zimmer’s implant showed a high failure rate – about 8.5%.

In response to Dr. Dorr’s results, Zimmer claimed that the product failure rates could be attributed to improper device implantation and poor surgical techniques. After a three-month suspension of sales, the device manufacturer put the Durom Cup back on the market and re-issued its surgical instructions. As of 2011, the Durom Cup is still available for sale.

FDA Recall Requirements

To qualify a product for mandatory product recall, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has strict requirements. There are three recall classifications – Class I, Class II, and Class III – and each has its own set of contributing factors.

A Class I recall is the most serious, and is only issued in cases where the FDA determines that a product “will cause serious health problems or death.” In this were the case, the FDA would require Zimmer Holdings Inc. to notify its clients and implant recipients of the recall and the reasons behind it. By FDA requirements, Zimmer would also have to take steps to remedy the dangers associated with its product.

Class II recalls represent a step down on the severity ladder, and describe products that have the potential to create serious health problems. If the Durom Cup hip implant were subject to a Class II recall, Zimmer would be required to inform it customers of the device’s risks, but would not have to contact recipients of the device. A Class III FDA recall is issued when the organization determines that one of its regulations has been violated.

FDA Warns Public, Requires Device Study

In February 2011, the FDA issued a public warning regarding the risks and problems associated with metal-on-metal hip implants, such as Zimmer’s Durom Cup device. In May 2011, the FDA also announced that all metal-on-metal device manufacturers, including Zimmer, would be required to conduct post-market studies to determine their products’ long-term performance.

Results of Zimmer’s studies, or a future FDA Zimmer recall, could have an impact on current Zimmer hip lawsuits. Since 2009, plaintiff complaints have been consolidated into federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), which is headquartered in New Jersey.

Divorce Lawyer Fort Worth

Feb 28, 2012
No Comments Yet
Time to file for divorce? Are you looking for a divorce lawyer in Fort Worth? Are you currently separated from your spouse or having long-term marital problems from which you need an end? Are you concerned that you will get an equal share of what you and your partner accumulated? You have come to the perfect place!

Fill in the following form and a lawyer will be in touch with you ASAP:

eLawsuit.com will help you find divorce lawyers in your area. We provide a fast service and assistance. After you fill out the simple form ABOVE, a divorce lawyer in Fort Worth will contact you as soon as possible.

In collaboration with TotalAttorneys.com, eLawsuit.com thanks you for visiting and we hope the best for you on your quest to find a divorce attorney that suits you!
  • Twitter feed loading...